Another fool liberal posted to my P-N blog.  I quickly put him in his place, but I have to reprint here because it's so much fun.

You liberals are too easy to rebut.  Why don't you get some new arguments to make it challenging?

"Don't think just because there have been tea parties and more media attention towards republican voices after the election that the Republican party as it stands now has any opportunity to rebound."  No, I think the Republicans will rebound because the Dems are doing such a good job of wrecking the economy.

"Here's a little historical fact for you, young people voted in record numbers in this past election and a vast majority voted for Obama."  Here's a little historical fact for you.  Young people are always liberals.  In the words of that famous conservative, Winston Churchill (even you must have heard of him), "Any man who is under 30, and is not a liberal, has not heart; and any man who is over 30, and is not a conservative, has no brains."  Grown ups are conservative because they've learned that choices must be made as part of the process of maturing.  Therefore, they'll be changing their stances shortly.  Get it, you brainless child?

"A vast majority are turned off by the anti-everything party that doesn't represent fiscal responsibility by a long shot (another little historical fact, Reagan had yearly federal deficits more then double what they were in during WW2 when FDR was in office, Bush added trillions to the federal debt after two years of surplus during the Clinton administration)."  Your "historical facts" are irrelevant and out of context.  For a full explanation, see my post by the same title, because I don't feel like writing it all again.  But the gist of it is that Reagan ushered in a 30-year era of prosperity after the deficit hawk Jimmy C. failed miserably.  Anyway, that "fact" is really moot because Obama in only one year will almost match G.W., who I admit made some mistakes fiscally, for his whole term, but the alternative would have been and will be much worse.  Just wait and see.

"Maybe the reason why Republicans like Specter can no longer be part of the Republican party is that it has strayed so far from it's [sic] ideals, as many people have said the Republican party is only supported by people who think the Republican party was started in 1980."  Specter can no longer be a part of the party because he was going to lose the nomination next year, just like I said.

"Neoconservatism backed by radical Christian extremist now dominates the Republican party, making it's [sic] ideals seem more like hypocrisy then a real political platform."  I think neoconservatism has been tempered somewhat, and even if it hasn't, it still looks a lot better than the appeasement practiced by the liberal Dems.  See my references in previous posts to Jimmy C.'s foreign policy.  And if by radical Christian extremists you mean people that think a moral country is a strong one, that's not hypocrisy.

"Take an issue like gay marriage, used by the Republican party to reel in voters. The Republican party wanted a federal ban against gay marriage, even though it claims to support the rights of the states to determine their own laws, such as in marriage, as determined by our Constitution."  I take it by "gay" marriage you mean homosexual marriage, the gateway to all kinds of deviant marriages, is that right?  We have to call these things what they are, after all, and homosexuals are anything but gay.  Actually, I think almost all the Dems in Congress also voted for the Defense of Marriage Act, which is what I believe is what you're referring to, but if you think deviant marriage is a winning issue for you, I strongly encourage you to pursue it politically - please!

"The Republican party uses the excuse of freedom of religion as an excuse for everything under the sun, yet wants to make abortion illegal because of a religious belief that life begins at conception. Young people can see through this conservative agenda as it is; an attack on our personal freedoms."  So First Amendment freedoms are an excuse, are they?  How about freedom of the press and assembly, are those "excuses" too?  I don't even have to ask about Second Amendment freedoms; I know you don't believe in those.  And life does begin at conception.  Try looking at an ultrasound sometime.  I've looked at four of them.  Interestingly, when anti-death (anti-abortion) groups show prospective aborters ultrasounds of their babies, they usually decide to cancel murder.  Even more interestingly, pro-death libbies try their best to prevent young women considering abortions from seeing these pictures.  That really says it all for me.  As for young people seeing through things, see my comments above.  Most people mature and grow up.  People like you are the exception.

Thanks for playing.